First of all, to start out, let me state categorically that
I have absolutely no personal vendetta against Bryant McGill. I do not know the
man and he, his publications, and his websites, are far from being the only “Celebrity”
or “Government Sponsored” archives, collections, or re-writings that are guilty
of the ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES that I am
about to point out; it is just that his name is becoming more and more linked
to my postings and this blog. Of course, I am not a “celebrity” and mine
are just little; non-commercial, insignificant, hobby blogs that do not really
matter—except to me—and-- my few international readers. For those of you that
may not already know:
“Bryant McGill is an internationally renowned author,
essayist, speaker and activist in the fields of self-development, personal
freedom and human rights. He is an iconic personality and cultural critic,
whose writings have reached millions of people and appeared in thousands of
works by other authors, educators and social leaders. His writings on values
have been featured alongside Mohandas Gandhi, Albert Einstein and Mother Teresa
at the prestigious Foundation for a Better Life, who has called McGill one of
“the brightest minds in human history.” In an official Congressional
commendation, the nation’s leaders applauded McGill’s, “highly commendable
life’s work,” as an Ambassador of Goodwill. His writings have been published in
over 70 books and translated into 15 languages by publishers such as Cornell
University, UNESCO, Simon and Schuster, Random House, HarperCollins, Writer's
Digest and Walt Disney Company. McGill is a sought after workshop leader, and a
speaker who has delivered speeches with diverse groups, from the Los Angeles
Mayor’s Office and Chief of the LAPD, to the United Nations, with Dr. Gandhi,
Grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, and the UN Secretary General for Disarmament
Affairs.”
--The above
information can be found on several websites: including but not limited to
bryantmcgill.com/about/ and wikipedia.com
So, since I have nothing personally against Mr McGill, just
what is the purpose of this posting? What are my complaints? Why do I object to
my name being linked to his? What are the illegal activities to which I refer?
1.
Any material that was first published before Sept
of 1923 is by US of A copyright law PUBLICDOMAIN.
2.
Any material,( by the same laws), of which the
original author or creator has been dead for over fifty years; is PUBLIC DOMAIN and cannot be re-copyrighted unless there have been “real and significant
artistic contribution”. While it cannot be denied that the translation of
poetry into a different language, or languages, while still maintaining the
essence or the original poem, requires considerable artistic talent; most of these works were fully translated before Mr. McGill was born and in any case, rights
apply to the modified version only—not to the original—or the original
copyright, which also cannot REALLY
be sold or taken over by anyone else. No matter what, it is still the original
copyright.
3.
You cannot copyright an idea. Short quotes generally represent ideas and for this reason are not subject to copyrights; and, while quotes about common
wisdom, creation, existence, family, love, life etch are often attributed to
some well-known celebrity there is absolutely no positive infallible way of knowing when they
were first said; or by whom. We do know that there is nothing that can be said today; that has not been expressed; as an idea, or as an opinion, by someone, somewhere, very much previously.
4. Any claim to copyrights of material which is in
the PUBLIC DOMAIN; especially when that material was translated into the various languages, published, and copyrighted, long before you were born, amounts to blatant plagiarism and is therefore illegal.
Mr McGill can not just decide that he is going to take over copyright of MY, OR ANYONE ELSE'S ORIGINAL, AND COPYRIGHTED WORKS; as he is apparently trying to do with my posting entitled TRUE AND LASTING LOVE DEFINED.
Mr McGill can not just decide that he is going to take over copyright of MY, OR ANYONE ELSE'S ORIGINAL, AND COPYRIGHTED WORKS; as he is apparently trying to do with my posting entitled TRUE AND LASTING LOVE DEFINED.
5. It does not take very thorough examination of the poems and quotations--most
of what is now claimed by, or commonly attributed to, Mr McGill-- to realize that, at the very least, it is exactly that—BLATANT, UNMITIGATED, PLAGIARISM.
No comments:
Post a Comment